If I could only have
two books by writers on writing, they would be John Gardner’s On Becoming A Novelist and his The Art Of Fiction. The following
description of the nature of the writer comes from page 34 of the 1999 Norton edition
of the first book above.
“Another
indicator of the novelist’s talent is intelligence – a certain kind of
intelligence, not the mathematician’s or the philosopher’s but the
storyteller’s – an intelligence no less subtle than the mathematician’s or the
philosopher’s but not so easily recognized.
Like other
kinds of intelligence, the storyteller’s is partly natural, partly trained. It
is composed of several qualities, most of which, in normal people, are signs of
either immaturity or incivility: wit (a tendency to make irreverent
connections); obstinacy and a tendency towards churlishness (a refusal to
believe what all sensible people know to be true); childishness (an apparent
lack of mental focus and serious life
purpose, a fondness for daydreaming and telling pointless lies, a lack of
proper respect, mischievousness, an unseemly propensity for crying over
nothing); a marked tendency toward oral or anal fixation or both (the oral
manifested by excessive eating, drinking, smoking and chattering; the anal by
nervous cleanliness and neatness coupled with a weird fascination with dirty
jokes); remarkable powers of eidetic recall, or visual memory (a usual feature
of early adolescence and mental retardation); a strange admixture of shameless
playfulness and embarrassing earnestness, the latter often heightened by
irrationally intense feelings for or against religion; patience like a cat’s; a
criminal streak of cunning; psychological instability; recklessness,
impulsiveness and improvidence; and finally, an inexplicable and incurable
addiction to stories, written or oral, bad or good. Not all writers have
exactly these same virtues, of course. Occasionally one finds one who is not
abnormally improvident.”
There you have it. Make a little allowance that this
came from the 1970’s – allowance only in the way that thoughts are expressed.
Gardner is describing the serious literary novelist, not the much more
desirable commercial animal.
Yep, reckon it's true and more Iris.This is definitely what a writers CV or personal profile might look like Writers are also incurably curious creatures, always wanting to know or understand how people tick.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the great post!
Yes, as I said, courtesy of Reg. Some of the negative labelling is a bit much, but the sentiment is kind of reassuring - that what might be seen as problematic in the general community, can be a positive advantage in the writing community. What does that say?!!
DeleteThanks for letting me publish it by the way, Reg :)Makes me want to find the book, and read it.
Delete